Image from Google Jackets

Five essays on emergency pathways : a study of acute admissions to London hospitals.

by Morrell, David C; Armstrong, David; Bartholomew, Jenny; Britten, Nicky; Gelder, Fiona; Green, Judith; Jankowski, Raymond; Jenkins, Clare; Mandalia, Sundhiya; Savill, Rebakah; Shaw, Adrienne.King Edward's Hospital Fund for London. King's Fund Institute; King Edward's Hospital Fund for London. King's Fund Commission on the Future of Acute Services in London.
Series: King's Fund London Initiative working paper ; no. 15.Publisher: London : King's Fund Institute, 1994.Description: 95p.ISBN: 1857170814.Class Number: HOQB:OA.Summary: In 1992 the King's Fund Commission published a report `London health care 2010 : changing the future of services in the capital'. This report was unable to describe in any detail the actual delivery of acute medical care in London. This required a more indepth study of care based on the collection of data at the grassroots. Recognising this omission the Commission asked the Departments of General Practice and Public Health Medicine at the United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital (UMDS) to undertake a series of studies that would describe the process of arranging an acute medical admissions to hospital for London residents. In view of the impending report from the Tomlinson Committee on the provision of medical care in London, the Commission asked for these studies to be carried out and reported on within a period of 12 months. They took place between September 1991 and May 1992 and the report was presented in October 1992 to the King's Fund Commission. This publication describes the results of these studies. The overall objectives were to describe the problems of admitting acutely ill patients into the wards of London hospitals, and to identify ways of facilitating the whole admission process and improve the experience of general practitioners, hospital doctors, nurses and patients. The chapters look at the view of service providers; emergency admission from a GP's perspective; workload and procedure in A & E departments; the patient experience of emergency admission; and district nurses and poorly planned discharges. [Introduction amended]..Subject(s): Accident & emergency departments | Acute services | Bed occupancy | Consumer views | District nurses | General practitioners | London | Patient admission | Patient discharge | Service provision | Service rationalisation | Staff attitudes | Workload
Digital copy
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
King's Fund publication The King's Fund Library Library Donation HOQBed:OA (Mor) (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 54001000358245
King's Fund publication The King's Fund Library Held in offsite storage Donation HOQBed:OA (Mor) (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 2 Available 54001000358252

In 1992 the King's Fund Commission published a report `London health care 2010 : changing the future of services in the capital'. This report was unable to describe in any detail the actual delivery of acute medical care in London. This required a more indepth study of care based on the collection of data at the grassroots. Recognising this omission the Commission asked the Departments of General Practice and Public Health Medicine at the United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital (UMDS) to undertake a series of studies that would describe the process of arranging an acute medical admissions to hospital for London residents. In view of the impending report from the Tomlinson Committee on the provision of medical care in London, the Commission asked for these studies to be carried out and reported on within a period of 12 months. They took place between September 1991 and May 1992 and the report was presented in October 1992 to the King's Fund Commission. This publication describes the results of these studies. The overall objectives were to describe the problems of admitting acutely ill patients into the wards of London hospitals, and to identify ways of facilitating the whole admission process and improve the experience of general practitioners, hospital doctors, nurses and patients. The chapters look at the view of service providers; emergency admission from a GP's perspective; workload and procedure in A & E departments; the patient experience of emergency admission; and district nurses and poorly planned discharges. [Introduction amended].

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha